Common Automation Errors in Testing

1. Trying to Automate Everything
Automating everything is like building a house without human touch—some tasks need human intuition.

  • Mistake:

    1. Attempt to automate exploratory tests that require subjective judgment.
    2. Example: Automating the verification of UI color consistency across different pages.
    3. Test Data Example:
      • Home Page Color: #FF5733 (Orange)
      • Product Page Color: #FF5733 (Orange)
    4. Issue: Automation may miss subtle visual differences that are better identified by a human tester.

  • Solution:

    1. Focus on automating repetitive, data-driven, and high-risk tests where automation adds the most value.
    2. Example: Automate the login process to ensure it works consistently across different browsers and environments.
    3. Test Data:
      • username: testuser
      • password: Test@123
    4. Steps:
      1. Open the application in Chrome and Firefox.
      2. Enter the username and password.
      3. Click the login button.
      4. Validate successful login by checking the user dashboard.

2. Automating Large Test Cases All at Once
Trying to automate a big test case in one go is like eating a whole pizza in one bite—overwhelming and prone to failure.

  • Mistake:

    1. Attempt to automate an entire e-commerce checkout process in a single test script.
    2. Steps typically include Add to Cart, Apply Coupon, and Complete Payment.
    3. Test Data Example:
      • Product ID: 12345
      • Coupon Code: SAVE20
      • Card Number: 4111 1111 1111 1111
    4. Issue: If the test fails, it’s difficult to pinpoint which step caused the issue, making debugging more complex.

  • Solution:

    1. Break down large test cases into smaller, manageable parts.
    2. Automate each part separately to ensure clarity and easier maintenance.
    3. Steps:
      1. Add to Cart:
        • Test Data: Product ID: 12345, Quantity: 2
        • Action: Select the product and add it to the cart.
        • Validation: Confirm the product is added to the cart successfully.
      2. Apply Coupon:
        • Test Data: Coupon Code: SAVE20
        • Action: Enter the coupon code and apply it.
        • Validation: Verify the discount is applied correctly.
      3. Complete Payment:
        • Test Data:
          • Card Number: 4111 1111 1111 1111
          • Expiry Date: 12/25
          • CVV: 123
        • Action: Enter payment details and process the payment.
        • Validation: Confirm payment success and order placement.

3. Combining Multiple Tests in One Script
Testing multiple things in one script is like cooking an entire meal in one pot—confusing and hard to debug.

  • Mistake:

    1. Combine different functionalities, such as login, profile update, and logout, into one test case.
    2. Test Data Example:
      • Login: username: user1, password: Pass123!
      • Profile Update: First Name: John, Last Name: Doe
      • Logout: Click on logout button
    3. Issue: If the test fails, it’s unclear whether the problem lies with the login, profile update, or logout process.

  • Solution:

    1. Create separate test cases for each functionality to improve clarity and ease of debugging.
    2. Steps:
      1. Login Test:
        • Test Data: username: user1, password: Pass123!
        • Action: Enter the login credentials and click the login button.
        • Validation: Verify successful login by checking the dashboard.
      2. Profile Update Test:
        • Test Data: First Name: John, Last Name: Doe
        • Action: Navigate to the profile section, update the first and last name, and save.
        • Validation: Confirm that the profile information is updated.
      3. Logout Test:
        • Action: Click on the logout button.
        • Validation: Ensure the user is redirected to the login page.

4. Being Inflexible with Test Execution Order
Rigidly following a test order is like sticking to a recipe without considering available ingredients—adaptability is key.

  • Mistake:

    1. Insist on running tests in a fixed, predefined order without considering opportunities for optimization.
    2. Example: Running "Login" first, then "Add to Cart", followed by "Checkout", even if these tests could be run in parallel.
    3. Issue: This approach can lead to inefficiencies, especially when tests could be executed independently and in parallel.

  • Solution:

    1. Design tests to be independent of each other, allowing for flexible execution order.
    2. Steps:
      1. Login Test:
        • Test Data: username: independentUser, password: FreePass123
        • Action: Perform the login process as an independent test case.
        • Validation: Check the dashboard to confirm successful login.
      2. Add to Cart Test:
        • Test Data: Product ID: 67890, Quantity: 1
        • Action: Add the product to the cart without depending on the login test.
        • Validation: Verify the product is in the cart.
      3. Checkout Test:
        • Test Data:
          • Card Number: 4111 1111 1111 1111
          • Expiry: 12/25
          • CVV: 123
        • Action: Complete the payment process.
        • Validation: Confirm the order is placed successfully.

5. Choosing Tools Based on Popularity Alone
Picking a tool because it’s popular is like buying the latest gadget without checking if it meets your needs.

  • Mistake:

    1. Select a tool solely because it's widely used, without evaluating if it fits the project’s specific requirements.
    2. Example: Using Postman for testing XML-based APIs.
    3. Issue: Postman is primarily designed for JSON, making XML validation more challenging and less efficient.

  • Solution:

    1. Choose tools based on their suitability for your project needs, not just popularity.
    2. Steps:
      1. Tool Evaluation:
        • Consider the data format your project primarily uses (e.g., XML).
        • Evaluate if the tool supports that format efficiently.
      2. Tool Selection:
        • For XML-based APIs, select SoapUI, which is designed for this purpose.
      3. Test Execution:
        • Test Data: Use an XML request like:
        • <Customer>
            <Name>John Doe</Name>
            <ID>12345</ID>
          </Customer> 
        • Action: Send the XML request using SoapUI.
        • Validation: Validate the response to ensure it meets the expected output.

6. Skipping Test Case Validation
Skipping validation is like building a bridge without inspecting the materials—it leads to failures.

  • Mistake:

    1. Automate a test case without including proper validation steps to ensure the expected outcome.
    2. Example: Automating a registration form submission without checking for the confirmation message.
    3. Test Data:
      • Name: Mark
      • Email: mark@example.com
      • Password: Pass@123
    4. Issue: The test may pass or fail without providing meaningful feedback, making it hard to assess the result.

  • Solution:

    1. Always include validation steps in your test cases to verify that the expected outcomes are achieved.
    2. Steps:
      1. Registration Form Submission:
        • Test Data:
          • Name: Mark
          • Email: mark@example.com
          • Password: Pass@123
        • Action: Fill in the registration form and submit it.
      2. Validation Step:
        • Expected Outcome: Verify the presence of a success message, such as "Registration successful."
        • Additional Check: Ensure that the user is redirected to the welcome page.

7. Ignoring Test Automation Maintenance
Neglecting maintenance is like skipping regular car check-ups—eventually, things will break down.

  • Mistake:

    1. Allow outdated test cases to remain in the automation suite without regular updates.
    2. Example: The password policy changes, but the test data still uses the old password format.
    3. Test Data:
      • Password: OldPass123 (8 characters, not compliant with the new policy)
    4. Issue: The test fails due to outdated test data, leading to unnecessary troubleshooting and delays.

  • Solution:

    1. Regularly update test cases and test data to reflect changes in the application.
    2. Steps:
      1. Update Test Data:
        • Change the old password to meet the new policy requirements.
        • Test Data: Password: NewPass@1234 (12 characters, compliant with the new policy)
      2. Review Test Cases:
      • Ensure all test cases align with the current application functionality.
      1. Run Regression Tests:
      • Execute the updated test suite to confirm that all cases pass with the new data.

8. Failing to Handle Dynamic Elements
Ignoring dynamic elements is like trying to catch a fish without considering the tide—things move and change.

  • Mistake:
    1. Use static locators (like XPath or CSS selectors) for elements that change frequently.
    2. Example: An e-commerce site where product IDs or button positions change with every page load.
    3. Test Data:
      • Locator: //button[@id='addToCart123']
      • Issue: The test fails if the ID changes dynamically.
  • Solution:
    1. Use dynamic locators or strategies like text-based or relative positioning to handle changing elements.
    2. Steps:
      1. Use Text-Based Locators:
        • Locator: //button[text()='Add to Cart']
        • Action: Identify the "Add to Cart" button based on its label rather than its ID.
      2. Use Relative Positioning:
        • Example: //div[@class='product'][1]//button[text()='Add to Cart']
        • Action: Locate the "Add to Cart" button relative to the product container.
      3. Implement Waits:
        • Use implicit or explicit waits to handle elements that load dynamically.
        • Example: WebDriverWait(driver, 10).until(EC.presence_of_element_located((By.XPATH, "//button[text()='Add to Cart']")))

9. Neglecting Cross-Browser Testing
Ignoring cross-browser testing is like building a website that only one person can view—limiting your audience.

  • Mistake:

    1. Automate tests on a single browser (e.g., Chrome) without considering other browsers like Firefox or Safari.
    2. Issue: The application may behave differently across browsers due to varying support for web standards.

  • Solution:

    1. Implement cross-browser testing to ensure your application works seamlessly on all supported browsers.
    2. Steps:
      1. Identify Target Browsers:
        • Example: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
      2. Set Up Parallel Test Execution:
        • Use a tool like Selenium Grid to run tests across multiple browsers simultaneously.
      3. Validate Consistency:
        • Ensure that key functionalities (e.g., login, navigation, form submission) perform identically across all browsers.

10. Overlooking Test Data Management
Poor test data management is like trying to cook without ingredients—it leads to incomplete or inaccurate tests.

  • Mistake:

    1. Reuse the same test data across multiple test runs without considering the need for fresh or varied data.
    2. Example: Using a static user ID for login tests without rotating test data.
    3. Issue: Repetitive data can lead to false positives or test failures when the data becomes stale or invalid.

  • Solution:

    1. Implement a robust test data management strategy that includes data rotation and freshness.
    2. Steps:
      1. Create a Test Data Pool:
        • Example: Maintain a set of user credentials, each with unique attributes (e.g., user1, user2, user3).
      2. Implement Data Reset Mechanisms:
        • Example: Reset the database state before each test run to ensure consistent conditions.
      3. Use Data-Driven Testing:
        • Leverage tools like TestNG’s DataProvider to pass varied data sets to your tests.

By addressing these common automation mistakes with practical solutions, you’ll enhance the reliability, efficiency, and effectiveness of your test automation efforts.

Post a Comment